How “No Junk Food” Policy Ignores Food Deserts in Black Community

The debate around healthy eating often overlooks the complex realities of food access, particularly in Black communities. Policies that aim to restrict “junk food,” such as potential limitations on SNAP benefits, fail to address the underlying issue of food deserts. These are areas where residents have limited access to affordable, nutritious food, leading to a reliance on ultra-processed options. This article examines how such policies disproportionately affect Black communities due to historical redlining and systemic inequalities. We’ll delve into the reasons why simply limiting access to certain foods isn’t a viable solution and advocate for a more holistic approach that considers accessibility, affordability, and social determinants of health.

The Reality of Food Deserts

Living in a food desert means facing daily challenges in accessing healthy, affordable food. Residents in these areas often rely on ultra-processed foods due to limited options. This is particularly true for Black communities, which have historically been affected by discriminatory practices. Systemic racism perpetuates this inequality, making it difficult for people to make healthy choices when limited by their environment. When people are hungry, access trumps preference. Where someone lives and works significantly impacts what they can eat. Therefore, focusing solely on willpower is a disservice to those who lack access to nutritious foods.

The Challenge of Accessibility

For those living far from grocery stores, keeping pantries full is a significant challenge, especially for individuals relying on public transportation. Adults working labor-intensive jobs may find it difficult to cook meals at home regularly. Homeless individuals lack the means to prepare and store food. The prevalence of potato chips, cookies, and pastries in low-income communities isn’t due to poor choices but rather a response to need. Therefore, we must shift the narrative from personal failings to systemic barriers that limit access to healthy options.

The SNAP Debate and Racial Implications

The debate around SNAP and food choices often carries subtle racial implications. Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s suggestion to restrict sweets for SNAP recipients reflects a limited understanding of the issue. While it’s true that ultra-processed foods are linked to negative health outcomes, prohibiting these products isn’t a comprehensive solution. Factors beyond personal preference impact dietary choices. Ultra-processed foods are cheaper to produce, meeting the dietary needs of a growing population. People in urban areas consume more processed foods due to fast-paced lifestyles. These foods are readily available and have a longer shelf life, making them appealing to those with limited time or access to stores.

The Role of Industrialization and Targeted Marketing

Industrialization plays a significant role in the overconsumption of ultra-processed foods. Advances in technology allow companies to produce these foods quickly and in abundance, leading to aggressive marketing strategies. A 2017 study showed a substantial increase in prepared food options within grocery stores, many of which are ultra-processed. Furthermore, food companies often target Black and Hispanic communities with advertisements for unhealthy products. Black children, for example, see twice as many television advertisements for these foods compared to their White peers. This evidence highlights the multi-faceted influences on dietary choices, extending far beyond individual decisions.

SNAP and Racial Disparities

The Supplemental Nutritional Assistance Program (SNAP) provides essential food access to millions of Americans. However, it’s often a subject of controversy. Some critics argue that recipients are undeserving, despite many being employed. This criticism is further complicated by racial stereotypes, particularly against Black people, who are often unfairly accused of abusing the program. These accusations overlook the lasting racial disparities in wealth. Black families are disproportionately reliant on the social safety net due to historical disadvantages, not a lack of effort. Therefore, limiting food choices for low-income families ignores the fundamental issue of unequal access.

Addressing Food Deserts, Building Health Equity

If we genuinely want to improve public health, we must address the root causes of unhealthy eating, including the presence of food deserts. Limiting access to processed foods without addressing the factors that contribute to their popularity is ineffective. We need a holistic approach that ensures everyone, regardless of their location or socioeconomic status, has access to nutritious food. This includes enabling SNAP recipients to purchase prepared meals, promoting work-life balance, addressing predatory advertising in Black communities, and advocating for living wages. Using punitive measures without providing adequate support will only exacerbate existing inequalities.

Echoes of the Past

The phrase “Let them eat cake,” often attributed to Marie Antoinette, symbolizes a callous disregard for poverty. The modern equivalent is ignoring the systemic barriers that prevent people from accessing healthy food. With rising food costs, even basic ingredients are becoming luxuries. If we truly care about health, we must focus on addressing the underlying issues of food access and affordability, particularly in marginalized communities. Only then can we create a society where healthy eating is a viable option for everyone.

Moving Towards Equitable Food Access

Far too many Americans lack easy access to fresh, healthy foods, particularly Black people in low-income communities. Limiting food options for SNAP recipients will only harm the most marginalized. We must address the systemic issues that perpetuate food deserts and health disparities. A more holistic approach is needed, one that ensures equitable access to nutritious food and support for healthy choices. By shifting our focus from individual responsibility to systemic change, we can create a healthier, more just society for all.

References

Aleccia, J. (2025, February 19). RFK Jr. suggests banning candy and soda from the $113 billion government program for low-income families: “we shouldn’t be subsidizing people to eat poison.” Fortune Well. https://fortune.com/well/2025/02/19/rfk-jr-snap-program-candy-soda-ban/

Bhutta, N., Chang, A. C., Dettling, L. J., Hsu, J. W., & Hewitt, J. (2020, September 28). Disparities in wealth by race and ethnicity in the 2019 survey of Consumer Finances. The Fed — Disparities in Wealth by Race and Ethnicity in the 2019 Survey of Consumer Finances. https://www.federalreserve.gov/econres/notes/feds-notes/disparities-in-wealth-by-race-and-ethnicity-in-the-2019-survey-of-consumer-finances-20200928.html

DeSilver, D. (2023, July 19). What the data says about food stamps in the U.S. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2023/07/19/what-the-data-says-about-food-stamps-in-the-u-s/

Grover, E. (2025, January 2). The overconsumption of ultra-processed foods in the United States. https://ballardbrief.byu.edu/issue-briefs/the-overconsumption-of-ultra-processed-foods-in-the-united-states#:~:text=Beyond%20just%20living%20far%20from,because%20they%20are%20shelf%20stable&text=and%20can%20stay%20fresh%20on,prioritize%20grocery%20shopping%20or%20cooking.&text=Among%20the%20top%2030%20largest,(measured%20in%20October%202023).&text=This%20comparison%20shows%20that%20people,UPFs%20are%20faster%20to%20prepare.&text=The%20ease%20of%20grabbing%20food,a%20quick%20and%20easy%20solution.&text=Thus%2C%20because%20of%20the%20distance,overconsumption%20of%20ultra%2Dprocessed%20foods.

Harris, J. L. (2020). Targeted Food Marketing to Black and Hispanic Consumers: The Tobacco Playbook. American Journal of Public Health, 110(3), 271. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2019.305518

Jones, J. (2025, January 31). Sen. Alsobrooks Shines Light on RFK Jr.’s medical racism. MSNBC. https://www.msnbc.com/the-reidout/reidout-blog/rfk-jr-alsobrooks-confirmation-hearing-vaccines-black-people-rcna190207

Jones, N. (2024, April 9). 2020 census illuminates racial and ethnic composition of the country. Census.gov. https://www.census.gov/library/stories/2021/08/improved-race-ethnicity-measures-reveal-united-states-population-much-more-multiracial.html#:~:text=to%20self%2Didentify.-,Black%20or%20African%20American%20Population,in%20combination%20population%20grew%2088.7%25.

Mozaffarian, D., Angell, S. Y., Lang, T., & Rivera, J. A. (2018). Role of government policy in nutrition — barriers to and opportunities for healthier eating. BMJ. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k2426

Vitale, M., Costabile, G., Testa, R., D’Abbronzo, G., Nettore, I. C., Macchia, P. E., & Giacco, R. (2024). Ultra-Processed Foods and Human Health: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies. Advances in Nutrition, 15(1), 100121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advnut.2023.09.009